Tuesday, 12 January 2010

Making light work of libertarianism

A third and final blast from the Mighty D, then my evening is complete. I am easily pleased, dear Boaty & D readers. Quite whether that was too much information for this time of the evening is for me to know and you to find out.

I want to talk about another issue that unites and brings libertarians together. Recently I talked about the Myleene Klass / offensive weapon row, which was in the press the other day. Today I am talking about something that can get all of us libertarians a-noddin'-and-a-smoilin'.

Yep, that's right. Work.

You don't have to be a Randite libertarian to appreciate and understand the importance of work for the individual. All libertarians know that it is by an individual's effort and personal endeavour that their successes and standing should be realised.

It underpins our stance on statism, welfarism, equality and individual rights. Everything ultimately comes down to 'what can the individual do for himself and his family', as opposed to what he can or must do for his state or for strangers.

We also know about what it means for the human soul. For pride and meaning. To work is to say ' I do not depend on or burden you, I am doing my bit. I am making my own way'.

There is much to say about work, and very little against it. If work is bad, and creates misery, then in a proper libertarian country, there would be choice, social mobility and a tax system that would be so beneficial for the individual, that fresh, new, different opportunities and ideas would abound.

But what I want to say about work is this. For me, libertarianism ought to never, ever be about snobbery or looking down on your fellow man for the work he does. I believe an entirely equal amount of respect and consideration ought to be given to people regardless of their job.

I have always taken this view and I will to my dying day. I speak to and regard a CEO of a company or a multi millionaire tycoon with not a speck of difference to the way I treat cleaners, cabbies and bar maids. Work, effort, productivity and self reliance are the values. The job spec and the money is irrelevant.

This is where the nuts and bolts of libertarianism is to be found. In how we see, treat and regard people according to what they say and do. This is what it is all about. Because how people are treated can manifest itself as a bed of roses or a blue touch paper attached to a large bomb. How people are treated is, fundamentally, one of the most important drivers of politics across the globe.

Treat people well and with consistent fairness, and no matter what your politics, you will get a good result. Treat them like dogs, and you could have the cure for Cancer in your sky rocket, but you'd still be seen as a total cunt.

It is with sadness, though not with surprise, that there are libertarians out there who would break from this proper position on work and individual worth. On 5th January, I popped on Old Holborn's blog (the notoriously rude, offensive blogger who masquerades as a 'libertarian') and he came back at me calling me dismissively and with haughty arrogance a: "moped seller from Bradford".

Even if I did sell mopeds and lived in Bradford, which I do not, what would be wrong with that? Some months back he came out with a similar theme, saying that I could not afford the 'bus fair from Bradford'.

Again, if I could not afford to visit London from Bradford via the Omnibus, and I can, why would that make me a lesser or unworthy person?

We as libertarians must junk such disgraceful attitudes if we are to progress as a philosophy in the hearts and minds of fellow Britons.

It doesn't matter what you do, or how much money you have. It is about the basics of our grand, beautiful political philosophy and one of those basic tenets is the importance of work. Whatever that work may be.

Oafish fools and misanthropic, sneering bigots such as that Holborn character who berated me for being a 'moped seller' do libertarianism a grave injustice. Ignore them, and their blind, blithering hypocrisy. Let them obsess over meaningless Westminster tittle tattle, and focus on things that are actually important and worth fighting for.

p.s. my comments on work won't apply to people who are retired. Obviously. They've done their bit.

12 comments:

Vladimir said...

What an odd insult.

I noticed that OH has added "Tory Totty" to his blogroll. It's an unbelievably shameless David Cameron fan site, complete with a campaign to raise £10,000 for the impoverished Old Etonian. Fine, we might say, but this is the same blogroll that you were struck off for not being a proper Libertarian. Just... weird.

J Demetriou said...

Good post, Vlad.

I would like to point out here that while OH petulantly and hypocritically removed all links to us from his site, because of a minor blog related disagreement a few months back, we have kept him on ours.

We intend to do a few blog related refurbishments soon, but he and other anti-Boaty & D people will not be purged.

Because we believe in freedom of speech. We don't smash people into obscurity simply because they say things we don't like. That is not what libertarianism is about.

OH serves one thing and one thing only. Himself. A bit like his ego-maniac mate, Guido.

We, on the other hand, have principles we stick by. We believe on our politics and we don't do double standards, selfishness or puerile bigotry.

Anonymous said...

Swallowed the bait and the dick's on the table again.

Like the Myleen thing, what you say has got fuck-all to do with libertarianism. Isn't it just about good manners in this case? Fuck me, you do like a good fucking scrap. Can you source a mint Fizzer for me?

J Demetriou said...

The Myleene Klass case was clearly about how the state and the police view private property rights and how they apply the law which affects private property and individual rights. So, er, I think libertarianism might just well have something to do with it.

And the concept and ethics behind work and employment is, in my view, intrinsically linked with libertarianism and objectivism. I suggest you go away and do a bit of reading, 'Anonymous'. OH is a prominent 'Libertarian' blogger, and so I think a link and a point can be made. Hence the piece.

Anything else?

Anonymous said...

"Anything else?" Yeasm love the inverted commas- well sneery. The Klass case was all about politicised Plod wrongly applying the law, and your feud with Anna Racoon and (latterly) with Holby is just getting fucking tiresome, and I've read Hayek, you condescending cunt.

Frank Davis said...

There is another and very ancient view of work, which is that it is a curse.

Personally, I prefer evenings to daytime, weekends to weekdays, and holidays to the rest of the year. Why? Because when I'm at work I'm constrained to work, and when I'm not I'm free to do as I choose. I prefer freedom. I've always been like that. And most people I've ever known have been like that too. Not many people want to spend more time at the office than they already do.

I can understand that people gain meaning and self-respect from work. Is that the only way to obtain it? I agree with your equal attitude to CEOs and canteen cleaners.

J Demetriou said...

Well don't read it or comment on it, you daft cunt. No-one's forcing you.

Hayek, you say? Fuck me over with a fish fork, you must be a true expert. I bow down to your superior wisdom on all things. I clearly am in no fit intellectual condition to comment. 'Anonymous'.

J Demetriou said...

Good post, Frank. The thing is, work doesn't have to imply being stuck in some shitty office. Work could be artistic, voluntary, stuff you do in the house to help sort stuff out and help yourself and family members. Looking after a sick relative. It has various forms.

None of this implies that we should feel guilt for time off and enjoyment. That, after all, is all fairly earned. People who doss on the state and procreate, however, ought to be feel ashamed as they are undoubtedly parasites. In the same way as uber-rich oligarchs who never worked for their money but stole it or commandeered it are parasites.

I want to repeat again, there is no difference in standing between the man who pulls pints at the Dog and Duck, and the billionaire footballer tycoon. I would not treat either any differently.

Obnoxio The Clown said...

Actually, it's high praise, JD. He's confused you with Johnny5.

Willy said...

I went to Tech in Bradford.

I couldn't stand the snobby way they looked down on us Keighley lads :)

Kevin Boatang said...

I once sold second hand scooters in Wakefield in an effort to raise the bus fare to get back to London. Does that count?

Anon, thanks there. Always good to have a moron rant and rave. Oh no, was that well sneery? Oh fuck me, my bad. Twat.

The Suburban Bushwacker said...

Excellent I can expose my self as a bigot!

I've often felt that the cleaner deserves a bit more kudos than the MD. Not because i have any silly belief in the dignity of labour, but because the cleaner has to suck it up, and be treated to a lifetime of disrespect , with knack all cash to show for it. A proper MD has to suck it up too, but they get wedged up, and treated as though their job tittle means they have some merit.

SBW