I'm being serious here, whoever you are and whatever your political leanings, unless you are a tribal Tory or someone who works for them (in which case, this piece is a waste of your time): please don't bother voting Tory when the election comes.
This Torygraph piece says it all: Clegg has refused Cameron's overtures for some sort of alliance, or prospective pact, with the election coming up. Cameron has made it clear that there is 'barely a cigarette paper' between the parties on most issues.
On a purely opportunistic basis, Cameron has his eye on the target number of seats he needs to win and he is worried that unless he makes significant inroads on the electoral map, he'll need to team up with the Limp Dems for victory over Labour.
But don't be fooled. Cameron's opportunism isn't simply based on a desperate need for seats at the next G.E. His politics is entirely compatible and in keeping with the politics of the Liberal Democrats - a party that is beyond pointless, weak, ineffectual and tame.
Cameron has, in the past, openly stated that his party is 'not a Libertarian' party. Conservatives and other rightists should be equally alarmed. For his party is neither conservative nor right in any real sense at all.
If he wins, the message will be clear - the Tories can only win, if they move leftwards and become socially democratic. A party that doesn't care about tax, the role of the state, crime and punishment, the role of the individual or even immigration.
If he loses, then his excessive shifting of the party to the left will be justly attacked as a mistake and based on a series of misnomers. The Tories were and probably are still a 'nasty' party - that doesn't mean right leaning politics is wrong. It doesn't mean Hague had it wrong. It doesn't mean libertarianism is wrong, or unpopular. The Tories can be nasty, and right wing policies can still be good.
'Call me Dave' has missed the boat. The zeitgeist that carried Blair to victory, and Hague to defeat, is dead. The peoples' desire for a bit of a spend up and a stronger state is dying. The new wave of thinking belongs to the libertarian right. And guess what? It has fuck all to do with the old Tories or the nasty right, and everything to do with a new approach to politics taking root in the hearts and minds of the public. More people want to see the reversal of the erosion of civil liberties. They want to see less tax, less interference, greater accountability and better democracy.
Cameron offers more of the same old New Labour same old - a strong EU, high taxes, a weak justice system, a bloated state, an unreformed welfare system and so it goes on.
You have everything to gain by Labour getting in again, and the Tories failing. Labour will carry on fucking the country, thus driving more and more people to eschew the left and remember never, ever to support them ever again. The Tories will be forced to reform, and this will entail having to listen to the public on issues. If they lose and still do not listen, they will die. It's that simple.
Would that be a bad thing?
Furthermore, if the Lib Dems get trounced, and this is looking likely, then they will have to look at the brand of liberalism they espouse. Perhaps they will consider choosing classical liberalism to replace progressive liberalism. A reversal, if you like, of what happened approximately one hundred years ago.
So, I implore you dear readers, to sack off the Tories at the election, and also sack of the Limps and Labour. Vote Libertarian, or failing their presence, UKIP. If both of these aren't there, vote Jury Team. If they aren't standing, then write some abuse on the slip and shove it in. Just don't vote for that bullshit pretend 'centre right' party that is, as Cameron believes, a party that has not a 'cigarette paper' between it and a centre left wing party.
Monday, 21 September 2009
Here's my advice for the next election: Don't Vote Tory
Posted by John Demetriou at 01:00
Labels: david cameron is a left wing pussy with an authoritarian outlook, do not vote tory, fuck labour, fuck the limp dems, fuck the tories
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)










10 comments:
I have no intention of voting for any of the (so called) big 3. By preference I'd vote LPUK, though any independent would do, though I doubt I could vote BNP. I do wish that vote papers had an option of "non of the above" if the choice is limited.
Quiet_Man .. .. .. you could always spoil your ballot rather than vote for one of the options listed??
There shite on the reversal of surveillance said is all last week. They will roll back the things that the Labourites will probably roll back anyway - ID cards, databases etc.
Not a dicky bird on the removal of cctv or intrusive anti-terror laws or stop and search.
The top two are shot as an idea, but not as a force. That is the problem today. Although I don't agree, where is the next SDP?
Who in the tories has the balls to split and form a new proper rightist libertarian party? WHo in the Labour camp has the balls to split and form a proper socialist party? The limps shit themselves at the idea of moving back to CL because the groundforce are a bunch of social democrats.
The one thing Cameron has now demonstrated beyond doubt is that he has no balls. He wants the vote, that's all he cares about and is shitting himself abour scary policies that people actually want.
True enough my friend, but the question here is: can we afford to allow Labour to retain power for another term?
I think we have to be realistic in trying to strike a balance between true reform (unlikely to be provided by the Tories) and the prevention of complete collapse of this country (likely to be provided by the Tories). Thus, I feel conflicted, should I betray my Libertarian leanings and vote to save the country in the short-term, or should I vote to with the hope of driving it into the mire.
I think Cameron is right when he says there's not a fag paper between his lot and the Lib Dems. If the Dems subscribed to classical Liberalism then I’d be inclined to agree, but this is far from the case. Neither knows what they stand for, at least Labour have it well documented that their beliefs extend to fucking up the country and nothing more, that visibility deserves some kudos at least.
I'm going to have to pass on the Jury Team - an ex-BNP dissident appears to have expressed an interest in joining.
I don't think it came to anything, but it makes me wonder what the smaller parties are attracting.
Looks like it might have to be UKIP, although I'm going to have to find a lot more before polling day...
I have no idea who is on my ballot, but if the indy is any good it will be them.
Knoll is right, Labour do deserve kudos for being open about their intention to completely fuck up the country. It's just a shame that no one was listening.
The lesson no one has learned from 97 is this: 'We need change'. But change to what?
"The lesson no one has learned from 97 is this: 'We need change'. But change to what?"
And all sorts of hopeful noises coming from the direction of the three main parties earlier this year - about radical changes to the way Parliament conducts itself and how there should be far more accountability to the electorate - have come to...what?
Fuck all, that I can see.
The public spending row is a very convenient smokescreen, isn't it?
A little bit of tinkering here, a little bit of fettling there and we're no further along in the process of getting the cunts that infest the major parties to do the jobs we pay them very handsomely to do.
As far as I can see, we have Call me Dave's proposal to cut the number of MPs by 10% and that's the sum total of change that we can expect to see.
You might as well stick a fucking Elastoplast on a 6" gash.
But enough of Harriet Harman...
I've been thinkning about this and have come up with a slightly different take.
http://aljahom.wordpress.com/2009/09/21/why-it-may-still-make-sense-to-vote-tory/
Pardon the gratuitous linkage, chaps, but it is relevant.
I seem to remember this line of argument from somewhere John......
Yeah, Hitchens. I've come to agree with him, though for different reasons.
I've fessed up to all this on his site many times so it's there's no cover up or anything.
Post a Comment