I was having a stroll though my locality yesterday when I noticed a public declaration, by way of several laminated bits of card, on what parties are standing in the region for the European Elections next month.
It was interesting to see that most of the parties on the list are right wing, or near as damn-it. Besides the Tories (yes, I know, but for tradition's sake we'll call them of the right) there are loads more. UKIP, BNP, Libertas, The Christian Party (per-fucking-leeeease!) and English Democrats.
Around the centre, there's the Lib Dems and an interesting outfit called 'Jury Team'.
And on the scum bag left there's Labour (urgh, I feel ill), the Greens (sad), the Socialist Labour Party (led by Arthur 'only got 200 votes in the 2001 election' Scargill) and a ridiculous far-left wing, anti-EU outfit called 'No2EU'. A party who only catches my eye because of the infuriating use of 'txt msg speak' in the title.
I've done some research on the lesser known outfits here. It is clear that all of these parties are total and utter shit, run by shit heads who's main task is to prevent everything from imploding through pathetic infighting. UKIP for instance is like Pakistan - in a permanent state of civil war and disintegration. The BNP has two public figures outside of Griffin, and this is for a reason - they are the only two people in the party with sufficient intelligence to use a PC and enunciate a coherent sentence without being drenched in the spittle of widespread mirth.
Libertas is basically UKIP, except with the selling point that they are cleaner and less dodgy on expenses etc. Which is hilarious, as one can't help but ask why Libertas people are any less venal and self-serving as anyone else.
BNP, Christians...meh. Who cares. Both nasty fascist outfits after power and the tools to impress their shitty world vision on everyone else.
Socialist Labour is brilliant, because it's like watching a footballer you don't like get old and go off to play for 2nd division or non league sides. For instance, if you hated Gazza, you'd probably have paid to go and see him puff about the pitch at Boston United. Scargill is a cunt, but at least while he's doing this lark, he's not in charge of an incredibly powerful union with the ability to destroy the country.
The Greens are utterly insane, and think they will be able to govern the country by whacking up some wind turbines, saying no to Nuclear and being kind to animals. This is all good for a hoot, but do we want them getting a tenth of the vote again like they did in '89? Probably not.
No2Eu can fuck off. Loony union prick bastards. It's bad enough I have to deal with people like this when I engage in my own union. Yes, I try to vote out the socialist freaks but it's no good, as a major Whitehall department staffed by fat lefties has the whip hand in the voting stakes. So sensible people like me are resigned to deal with their petty little point scoring exercises.
There is one outfit that particularly caught my eye, and for several reasons:
English Democrats are an outfit I have not heard of before this election campaign. Their website is spectacularly bad. Their 'campaign' is non existent, unless you include one flyer. And most of all, their policies are depressing in their malformation. They want to properly deal with the West Lothian Question - fair enough, sounds good right? Except they'd do this by setting up an 'English First Minister, government and Parliament with at least the same powers as the Scottish ones!'
Exclamation mark theirs.
Except, there's one glaring error here. We already have a parliament, it's called WESTMINSTER. And by setting up a government, I take it to mean 'get elected'. Yeah, we got that bit, thanks. And as for English First Minister, er, you mean the PM?
And the best bit 'at least the same powers as the Scottish ones!'. You mean, less power than we would have now then?
They could make all this sound so much easier and realistic if they simply proposed to break up the Union, or devolve power to the other parts of the union in order to break the rules concerning Scottish MPs voting on English issues.
The fact this party hasn't grasped even the basics of politics shows what a hilariously bad tin pot outfit they are. It's a shame, as the right sentiment is there it's just backed up by stupidity.
Another policy of this stupid party is to close quangos that promote political correctness and to repeal PC laws. I have tried to find out more on this policy, to no avail. So I presume the policy is actually as stupid as it sounds.
Well here's the question: what or who can possibly be accurately defined as PC and why would closing down an organisation possibly be the answer? If you took this argument to the logical degree, it would entail closing down the vast majority of the mechanisms of the State. It would also mean tremendous arguments on what laws are PC and promote PC.
This policy is so daft and ill-thought out, there are probably some Mail readers out there who would raise a questionable eye brow at it all. And that's saying something, because Mail readers are retarded, moronic cunts.
On the EU, this outfit proposes to get the UK to quit the EU, and then rejoin the European Free Trade Association. Well, if only it could be that easy. There's one snag with this plan: politics. It simply wouldn't be allowed to play out that way. It's the political equivalent to having your cake and eating it. But we can all be dreamers.
The sad thing is, I share a right leaning perspective on most of these issues, except what would be refreshing is that thing called 'use of brain'. I also don't like being patronised, taken for a mug and scaremongered. Read: I wouldn't vote BNP even under pain of torture. I have pride.
So who is it going to be, seeing as the LPUK have depressingly chosen not to contest this election in my region?
Is it going to be UKIP?
So far, the weather vane is tipping that way...
Monday, 25 May 2009
June 4th Euro Elections and thoughts
Posted by John Demetriou at 00:32
Labels: european elections 2009, political parties, political parties standing in euro 2009 elections, thoughts
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)










10 comments:
reppealing laws. Everything enacted since 1997 to be reppealed would be a good start, including EU directives. Noo Labour have criminalised way too many activities. A vain hope unfortunately.
Dear Blog Owner
Before you "label" anything English as being Racist or Biggotted of "Far Right"
Then ask yourself
Is anything Scottish Racist?
Is anything French Racist?
Is anything Irish Racist?
Is anything American Racist?
Is anything Italian Raicist ?
Once you have answered No (Hopefully) to all 5 questions, you will then have an Open mind to view "Englishness" as possibly a passion and a cuase.
Now watch these videos here >>
http://www.youtube.com/EnglishDemocrat
Do you really think NOW that the English Democrats is a Far Right Wing Outfit or an attempt for fairness for England within the United Kingdom.
Steve Uncles
Lead Candidate
English Democrats - South East
Mr Uncles
Your incoherent post offers no enlightenment to the questions I have clearly asked of you, and it offers nothing further to your third party criticism of the article.
As I have clearly stated, I have not yet decided on whether EDP are far right and that is not really important here.
What is pertinent are the criticisms and points I have raised about your manifesto. Why not try to engage with that?
You are avoiding the main points raised in this and my latest article.
It's probably also worth pointing out here that my article says nothing about the EDP being racist. I have attacked your policies on constitutional reform, the EU and political correctness.
So either respond to my points, or else be seen, surely, as an avoider of valid questions and polite, civilised debate.
And of course to add, I'd ask you to provide evidence of where I have labelled English things as racist/bigotted or far right.
If you can't offer evidence, an apology please for the misrepresentation?
It's like he's channeling Al Murray and Derek Draper.
It's a sure-fire winner!
AJ
I'll be honest, I expected far more from this bloke, even though I've not hitherto heard of him.
I thought he'd at least try and distance himself from his supporter's (cassie's) extreme, bilious, racist posting.
But no! Quite the contrary - he joins in and sticks his odd-ball little boot in for good measure.
The bloke can have his opinions: my point is that I want him to engage with mine, or at least calmly and rationally state his so we can have a proper debate.
Or so we can address the points I raised in the articles I wrote - the articles he is so interested in, he reproduced on not one but TWO discussion forums in quick succession.
He is so stupid, that not only has not done this, but little he has said shows him to be a grade A idiot of the highest order.
For a proud Englishman, and for someone who detests me for being foreign (even though I'm not) he:
*Cannot spell.
*Cannot string a coherent sentence together or use grammar correctly.
*Cannot construct an argument (or as he calls it 'arguement') or respond without making a stupid, dumb knee jerk remark.
He accuses me of running scared, when I've offered him umpteen opportunities today to respond here on my site.
What more evidence do you want that this man and his party are idiots?
'The Greens are utterly insane, and think they will be able to govern the country by whacking up some wind turbines, saying no to Nuclear and being kind to animals. This is all good for a hoot, but do we want them getting a tenth of the vote again like they did in '89? Probably not.'
i don't see why not, that's how the germans did it.
John,
"So who is it going to be, seeing as the LPUK have depressingly chosen not to contest this election in my region?"We took a decision -- based on both pragmatism and ideology, i.e. they are expensive and we have no interest in trying to rule other peoples -- that we would not contest EU elections at all.
DK
"Except, there's one glaring error here. We already have a parliament, it's called WESTMINSTER. And by setting up a government, I take it to mean 'get elected'. Yeah, we got that bit, thanks. And as for English First Minister, er, you mean the PM?
The only "glaring error" is yours.
Let me explain. Westminster is the seat of the United Kingdom government. It IS NOT the seat of the English parliament. By the way, your chicanery, i.e. deception by artful subterfuge or sophistry, is about nine years out of date. Ha! ha! Anti-English bigots gave up using "oh but we already have an English parliament at Westminster" years ago you mug. Gawd!
"And the best bit 'at least the same powers as the Scottish ones!'. You mean, less power than we would have now then?"
"We"? Look! If the English parliament has the same powers as the scottish parliament then it couldn't possibly have less power could it? It is quite obvious really. Even to you.
Anon, I'll say here again in case you obsessively check all these comment sections:
Get Fucked.
You mad as a hatter bell end.
Post a Comment